Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: Two more suggestions


Veteran Member - Level 3

Status: Offline
Posts: 471
Date: Apr 2, 2012
Two more suggestions
Permalink  
 


Support for the last one.

We have too many early aircraft mingling with other developments, and without a split enabled they are unfortunately stuck there.



-- Edited by Gunship on Monday 2nd of April 2012 09:53:45 PM

__________________
Alan Dallas


Veteran Member - Level 2

Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Date: Apr 2, 2012
Permalink  
 

How about separate sections for the following:

Early helicopters before 1945

Unmanned rotorcraft



__________________

Dear Princess Celestia,

Today I learned that nopony kicks ass without tanker gas. Nopony!

Your faithful student,
Fluttercopter



Global Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1524
Date: Apr 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

Yes, I like the last one too. But problem is we have those mixed with other stuff too! >.<



__________________

Airplanes are beautiful dreams. Engineers turn dreams into reality.



Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 3483
Date: Apr 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

I'll see what I can do. Let me review the topics first.



__________________

lllll   As of 2019 I have transitioned; My name is now Rei. Please don't deadname or misgender me, thank you. <3   lllll

555


Former Deputy Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 783
Date: Jun 11, 2012
Permalink  
 

I support these suggestions, but they will have to wait until we get a split feature.



__________________

Yippie Kai Yay, Mr. Falcon.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard