Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: Poll: Aircraft variant- and subvariant-specific pages?
Aircraft variant- and subvariant-specific pages? [9 vote(s)]

Yes, I support the creation of separate variant-specific pages.
55.6%
No, I prefer them included in the original pages.
44.4%


Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: Mar 23, 2014
Poll: Aircraft variant- and subvariant-specific pages?
Permalink  
 


Something I've wondered if I should do for a while now, but I want your input on it. Should I create separate pages at the main site regarding variants and subvariants of specific designs?

e.g., instead of Mi-24D and Mi-24V in the same Mi-24 page, have separate pages on them entirely?



__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------


Global Moderator

Posts: 1328
Date: Mar 23, 2014
Permalink  
 

You got support from me. I hate them bunched together in one page It feels too awkward. >.>



__________________
Airwolf_logo.jpg


Member

Posts: 17
Date: Mar 23, 2014
Permalink  
 

From my point of view all modification must be on the same page as is main variant

It will be easy to follow the history of Mi-24 tree, for example.



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 117
Date: Mar 23, 2014
Permalink  
 

I voted no. It would be too convoluted.



__________________

The nice thing about egotists is that they don't talk about other people.
======================================================
Count Hermann Keyserling once said truly that the greatest American superstition was the belief in facts.



Senior Member - Level 1

Posts: 500
Date: Mar 24, 2014
Permalink  
 

Ucon and aschiro have some good points. Keep the variants in the same pages. The lists are long enough as it is.



__________________
Alan Dallas


Global Moderator

Posts: 1328
Date: Mar 24, 2014
Permalink  
 

If it clutters up the main lists than there should be variant lists in the main pages linking to the separate pages. This organization sounds more sensible to me.



__________________
Airwolf_logo.jpg


Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: Mar 24, 2014
Permalink  
 

Sub-pages within the main pages was my original intention when thinking up this organization method. I probably should've specified that in my initial post.



__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------


Veteran Member - Level 3

Posts: 427
Date: Jun 1, 2014
Permalink  
 

Leela25 wrote:

If it clutters up the main lists than there should be variant lists in the main pages linking to the separate pages. This organization sounds more sensible to me.


 This is perfect. I support this option.



__________________

We have here the latest in primitive technology.

Internet + Opinions = OMG we are SCREWED!



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 157
Date: Jun 20, 2014
Permalink  
 

I voted yes on the condition that subpages are listed on variant lists in the aircraft pages, not the main lists.



__________________

Dear Princess Celestia,

Today I learned that nopony kicks ass without tanker gas. Nopony!

Your faithful student,
Fluttercopter



Global Moderator

Posts: 1328
Date: Jun 22, 2014
Permalink  
 

Get on it Stingy! What are you waiting for? D you need more votes or something? :o



__________________
Airwolf_logo.jpg


Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: Jun 25, 2014
Permalink  
 

I'll get on it when I can. I Have lots of other things to do first.



__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard