Something I've wondered if I should do for a while now, but I want your input on it. Should I create separate pages at the main site regarding variants and subvariants of specific designs?
e.g., instead of Mi-24D and Mi-24V in the same Mi-24 page, have separate pages on them entirely?
You got support from me. I hate them bunched together in one page It feels too awkward. >.>
From my point of view all modification must be on the same page as is main variant
It will be easy to follow the history of Mi-24 tree, for example.
I voted no. It would be too convoluted.
The nice thing about egotists is that they don't talk about other people.======================================================Count Hermann Keyserling once said truly that the greatest American superstition was the belief in facts.
Ucon and aschiro have some good points. Keep the variants in the same pages. The lists are long enough as it is.
If it clutters up the main lists than there should be variant lists in the main pages linking to the separate pages. This organization sounds more sensible to me.
Sub-pages within the main pages was my original intention when thinking up this organization method. I probably should've specified that in my initial post.
Leela25 wrote:If it clutters up the main lists than there should be variant lists in the main pages linking to the separate pages. This organization sounds more sensible to me.
This is perfect. I support this option.
We have here the latest in primitive technology.
Internet + Opinions = OMG we are SCREWED!
I voted yes on the condition that subpages are listed on variant lists in the aircraft pages, not the main lists.
Dear Princess Celestia,
Today I learned that nopony kicks ass without tanker gas. Nopony!
Your faithful student,Fluttercopter
Get on it Stingy! What are you waiting for? D you need more votes or something? :o
I'll get on it when I can. I Have lots of other things to do first.