Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: LASH (Light Anti-Submarine Helicopter)


Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: May 18, 2012
LASH (Light Anti-Submarine Helicopter)
Permalink  
 


It turns out the Bell Model 608 wasn't a part of LAMPS, but an earlier program called LASH. I just discovered this program at SPF in a comment from Stephane.

Anyone know more about it?



__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 107
Date: Jun 8, 2012
Permalink  
 

Wow, this one is news to me. Will try to find what I can online.



__________________


Former Deputy Administrator

Posts: 897
Date: Jun 9, 2012
Permalink  
 

You won't... Others have tried!

__________________

Stéphane



Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: Jun 9, 2012
Permalink  
 

It should be noted this lesser-known program predates LAMPS (Mk.I of which began in October 1970), somewhere in the 1960's timeframe, as evedent by this Vertiflite article dated 1968:

http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=TTlWAAAAMAAJ&q=Bell+608+LASH+(Light+Anti-Submarine+Helicopter)&dq=Bell+608+LASH+(Light+Anti-Submarine+Helicopter)&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7dS0T8jqDMyVmQXC4rX2Dw&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA 



__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 107
Date: Jun 9, 2012
Permalink  
 

The more I read into it, the more I come to the conclusion that LASH shortly became LAMPS around the time the UH-2 Seasprites were re-engined with more powerful T58s. As far as I can tell, the naval requirements are not very different. Here the navy was in the late 60s with the urgent need of light ASW helicopter to assist surface fleets, so they issue the request for development of a helicopter fitted for the role.

Now, the Seasprite wasn't selected until October 1970 of the LAMPS program. Unless LASH only indicated the class of aircraft, I assume it was an early conception of LAMPS, before possible changes were made that allowed the selection of the Seasprite as the dedicated LAMPS I airframe.



-- Edited by SuperStallion on Sunday 10th of June 2012 12:13:27 AM

__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 219
Date: Jun 9, 2012
Permalink  
 

I admit, at least some of that makes sense. Remember that Hughes submitted a navalized OH-6 to the program in 1969, obviously before the UH-2 came into the picture. It was definitely a light bird, and did carry ASW equipment to LAMPS standard, even though the program seems to have bore that acronym a year later.

But, of course, the OH-6 was quite a stretch. Sure it was light and all, but it was far too small. Perhaps this is where requirements were either changed or clarified a bit more, which eventually led to the selection of the UH-2?



__________________


Senior Member - Level 1

Posts: 500
Date: Jun 9, 2012
Permalink  
 

SuperStallion wrote:

As far as I can tell, the naval requirements are not very different. 


 

Do you have a source to support this? I would love to see the details regarding the LASH program requirements.



__________________
Alan Dallas
555


Former Deputy Administrator

Posts: 803
Date: Jun 11, 2012
Permalink  
 

This is the first time I 've heard of an actual LAMPS type program shortly before the acronym was coined. Though your posts are clearly guesswork, I think they are the most plausible explanations as to what came of it. Thanks for this.



__________________

Yippie Kai Yay, Mr. Falcon.



Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: Aug 29, 2012
Permalink  
 

Bell 608 stuff:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/sets/72157627928485093/



Attachments
__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard