Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: Rotorcraft Recognition Challenge: Name that variant!


Senior Member - Level 2

Posts: 774
Date: Feb 3, 2012
RE: Rotorcraft Recognition Challenge: Name that variant!
Permalink  
 


sweet, ok here is my challenge

 

WTF.jpg



__________________

Keep Low. Move Fast. First Kill. Die Last
One Shot. One Kill. No Luck. Pure Skill.

 



Moderator

Posts: 180
Date: Feb 4, 2012
Permalink  
 

Hte Branly B-2J10. ^_^



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 226
Date: Feb 4, 2012
Permalink  
 

Edo got it. That was pretty easy.



__________________


Senior Member - Level 2

Posts: 774
Date: Feb 5, 2012
Permalink  
 

your up, Edo

__________________

Keep Low. Move Fast. First Kill. Die Last
One Shot. One Kill. No Luck. Pure Skill.

 



Moderator

Posts: 180
Date: Feb 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

Ok ^^

 

sa361-i.jpg



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 157
Date: Feb 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

SA-360 Dauphin?



__________________

Dear Princess Celestia,

Today I learned that nopony kicks ass without tanker gas. Nopony!

Your faithful student,
Fluttercopter



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

 think it's actually an SA 361

  Ray



-- Edited by rotorwash on Tuesday 7th of February 2012 03:47:26 AM

__________________


Moderator

Posts: 180
Date: Feb 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

Rotorwash is next. ^



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 226
Date: Feb 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

Italian Dragon wrote:

Ok ^^

 

sa361-i.jpg


 

Cool pic of it too! Haven't seen it without the nose FLIR.



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 6, 2012
Permalink  
 

Here ya go.

mystery.jpg



__________________


Former Deputy Administrator

Posts: 897
Date: Feb 7, 2012
Permalink  
 

That's the Bolkow Bö-115 -I, a PAH-2 contender. Other (much different) variants were designed later.

__________________

Stéphane



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 107
Date: Feb 14, 2012
Permalink  
 

Very weird. Looks like it uses the same engine and rotor system as the Bo 105.



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 14, 2012
Permalink  
 

Stargazer2006 wrote:

That's the Bolkow Bö-115 -I, a PAH-2 contender. Other (much different) variants were designed later.


 Doh, sorry I forgot this post.  Your right so looks like you are up.

   Ray



__________________


Former Deputy Administrator

Posts: 897
Date: Feb 16, 2012
Permalink  
 

Okay. This one shouldn't be too difficult to figure out.



Attachments
__________________

Stéphane



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 16, 2012
Permalink  
 

Bell 214 ST, right?  I better not miss this one or I'll have to hide my head in shame!

  Ray



__________________


Former Deputy Administrator

Posts: 897
Date: Feb 16, 2012
Permalink  
 

Bah, too easy, I knew you'd find it... Your turn, again!

__________________

Stéphane



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 16, 2012
Permalink  
 

Stargazer2006 wrote:

Bah, too easy, I knew you'd find it... Your turn, again!


 As it turns out I'm just s Bell helo nut.  There are very few Bell birds I've not seen at least once.  Anyway, here's a Bell that should take a minute or two.  Course knowing you guys penchant for anything totally wierd, maybe not!

    Ray

mystery%2520helo.jpg

 



__________________


Administrator

Posts: 3381
Date: Feb 16, 2012
Permalink  
 

I have to confess... I've never seen this before! Looks like a JetRanger (or similar model) prototype, or experimental UH-1 for testing the systems of the future model.



__________________
Brony rotorhead
--------------------------
               ζ  
--------------------------


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 16, 2012
Permalink  
 

Stingray wrote:

I have to confess... I've never seen this before! Looks like a JetRanger (or similar model) prototype, or experimental UH-1 for testing the systems of the future model.


 Yes it was an experimental outfit of a standard Bell model.  Not a jetranger.  Looks like a UH-1 but not a military variant.  Ah cummon, you guys love a challenge around here!

   Ray



__________________


Former Deputy Administrator

Posts: 897
Date: Feb 17, 2012
Permalink  
 

The color schem points to the unique Bell 533 demonstrator, the first Huey that was tested with four blades, additional jets, etc. I wasn't aware, however, that they had also tried counter-rotating rotors on it!!!

__________________

Stéphane



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 17, 2012
Permalink  
 

Stargazer2006 wrote:

The color schem points to the unique Bell 533 demonstrator, the first Huey that was tested with four blades, additional jets, etc. I wasn't aware, however, that they had also tried counter-rotating rotors on it!!!


 I'll give you that it looks similar to the 533.  however, check the chin bubbble, the nose is completely different 9pretty much like a Bell 212 from what i can tell).  Also, there is no "ARMY" on the side as this was a civilian project.  Third, except for the photos showing her on display at Eustis, I have never seen a pic of the 533 with the "surfboard" on top of the rotor houseing.  I will tell you this, it was a prototype airframe of a model that was eventually mass produced.  That should really narrow down the possibilities.

   Ray



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 219
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

At first I was going to call it the XH-40, but the rotor housing maks it look closer to the Bell Model 533. I recall a variant that specially tested the Gnome engine, is this it or did this have the original T53-09A?



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

retroistic wrote:

At first I was going to call it the XH-40, but the rotor housing maks it look closer to the Bell Model 533. I recall a variant that specially tested the Gnome engine, is this it or did this have the original T53-09A?


 I gotta confess I have no idea what engine this bird has.  The best clue I can give is that it is a CIVIL variant so not any of the models tested by the military.  If you know Bell's civil designations, I have practiaclly given the answer away.  Just look beyond all the crazy fairings and such and think what she would look like underneath.

   Ray



__________________


Senior Member - Level 1

Posts: 500
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

Stingray wrote:

I have to confess... I've never seen this before! Looks like a JetRanger (or similar model) prototype, or experimental UH-1 for testing the systems of the future model.


 

Wouldn't make sense because the 206 prototype was an LOH contender. Since this is apparently a civil project, it shouldn't have any ties with the 206A+ series.



__________________
Alan Dallas


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 219
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

Gunship wrote:
Stingray wrote:

I have to confess... I've never seen this before! Looks like a JetRanger (or similar model) prototype, or experimental UH-1 for testing the systems of the future model.


 

Wouldn't make sense because the 206 prototype was an LOH contender. Since this is apparently a civil project, it shouldn't have any ties with the 206A+ series.


 Unless it tested improvements intended for the civilian producton line.



__________________


Senior Member - Level 1

Posts: 500
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

Possilble. But then why use a short 204?



__________________
Alan Dallas


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 157
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

Uh that's sort of a dumb question, Gunship. Lots of configurations were tested on different airframes for other aircraft models.



__________________

Dear Princess Celestia,

Today I learned that nopony kicks ass without tanker gas. Nopony!

Your faithful student,
Fluttercopter



Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 226
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

rotorwash wrote:
Stingray wrote:

I have to confess... I've never seen this before! Looks like a JetRanger (or similar model) prototype, or experimental UH-1 for testing the systems of the future model.


 Yes it was an experimental outfit of a standard Bell model.  Not a jetranger.  Looks like a UH-1 but not a military variant.  Ah cummon, you guys love a challenge around here!

   Ray


 

At the risk of losing I'll answer with D-326.



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 223
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

This bird is not related to the 206.  It started life as the prototype of one of the civil variants of the Huey.  Pretty short list of contenders now I think.

   Ray



__________________


Veteran Member - Level 2

Posts: 107
Date: Feb 28, 2012
Permalink  
 

D-326 was the Clipper titlt-rotor.



-- Edited by SuperStallion on Wednesday 29th of February 2012 04:58:51 AM

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 613  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard